Engineering and Technology | Open Access |

Advanced Security and Stability Analysis in Modern Android and IoT Systems: Integrating Automated Penetration Testing, Machine Learning, and Control Techniques

Johnathan R. Mitchell , Department of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of mobile applications, IoT-enabled systems, and complex multi-vendor infrastructures has intensified the challenges of ensuring system security, stability, and operational integrity. Traditional manual security assessments are increasingly inadequate to address the volume, diversity, and dynamic nature of contemporary software and hardware ecosystems. This study examines the integration of automated vulnerability assessment and penetration testing (VAPT) with advanced machine learning models, threat intelligence, and fuzzy logic-based control strategies to enhance the detection and mitigation of security risks while ensuring system stability. The research synthesizes methodologies from static and dynamic code analysis for Android applications, automated penetration testing in multi-vendor systems, and stability analysis of power electronic converters using state-space techniques. Additionally, the work explores the application of Internet of Things (IoT) frameworks in monitoring critical infrastructure, agricultural systems, and mobile devices, highlighting the importance of real-time threat intelligence and adaptive detection mechanisms. Key contributions include a detailed evaluation of AI-enhanced penetration testing frameworks, a theoretical model for fuzzy logic-based control in series-parallel resonant converters, and a comprehensive discussion on integrating continuous security testing into DevSecOps pipelines. The findings suggest that combining automated VAPT, predictive machine learning models, and advanced control theory can significantly improve detection accuracy, reduce false positives, and enhance overall system resilience. The study provides a multidisciplinary perspective, emphasizing both cybersecurity and system stability considerations, offering practical guidance for researchers and practitioners in deploying robust and intelligent monitoring frameworks.

Keywords

Automated Penetration Testing, Machine Learning, Android Security, IoT Monitoring

References

D. Lai and J. Rubin, "Goal-Driven Exploration for Android Applications," 2019 34th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE), San Diego, CA, USA, 2019, pp. 115-127, doi: 10.1109/ASE.2019.00021.

C. Nagarajan and M. Madheswaran, "Stability Analysis of Series Parallel Resonant Converter with Fuzzy Logic Controller Using State Space Techniques," Electric Power Components and Systems, Vol. 39, No. 8, pp. 780-793, May 2011.

G. Neelakrishnan, P. Iraianbu, T. Abishek, G. Rajesh, S. Vignesh, "IoT Based Monitoring in Agricultural," International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, March 2020, Vol. 9, Issue 3, pp. 814-819.

H. Ge, L. Ting, D. Hang, Y. Hewei and Z. Miao, "Malicious Code Detection for Android Using Instruction Signatures," 2014 IEEE 8th International Symposium on Service Oriented System Engineering, Oxford, UK, 2014, pp. 332-337, doi: 10.1109/SOSE.2014.48.

C. Nagarajan and M. Madheswaran, "Experimental Study and Steady State Stability Analysis of CLL-T Series Parallel Resonant Converter with Fuzzy Controller Using State Space Analysis," Iranian Journal of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 259-267, September 2012.

C. Nagarajan, G. Neelakrishnan, R. Janani, S. Maithili, G. Ramya, "Investigation on Fault Analysis for Power Transformers Using Adaptive Differential Relay," Asian Journal of Electrical Science, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-8, 2022.

Shabtai, Y. Fledel and Y. Elovici, "Automated Static Code Analysis for Classifying Android Applications Using Machine Learning," 2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, Nanning, China, 2010, pp. 329-333, doi: 10.1109/CIS.2010.77.

J. Nash and P. Martin, "Adapting Penetration Testing for Modern Multi-Vendor Systems," Cybersecurity Review, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 202-215, 2021.

Doe and K. Lee, "Continuous Integration of VAPT in DevSecOps," Journal of Information Security and Privacy, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 129-145, 2022.

E. Roberts and T. Wang, "Improving Penetration Testing Accuracy with AI and Machine Learning," Cyber Intelligence & Analysis, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 55-78, 2023.

M. Carter and H. Zhang, Hands-On Penetration Testing with Burp Suite and Metasploit, Packt Publishing, 2021.

S. Williams and B. Jones, "Evaluating False Positives in Automated Penetration Tests," Journal of Cybersecurity Metrics, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 20-35, 2020.

C. Kim and N. Patel, "The Role of Open-Source Tools in Modern Cyber Defense," Cybersecurity Tools and Techniques, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 202-220, 2022.

L. Martinez and D. Clark, "Threat Modeling in Automated VAPT Systems," Journal of Advanced Security Practices, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 75-89, 2023.

R. Gomez and J. Adams, "Leveraging Real-Time Threat Intelligence for Enhanced Cyber Defense," International Journal of Cybersecurity Solutions, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 48-67, 2021.

Security and Privacy Testing Automation for LLM-Enhanced Applications in Mobile Devices, International Journal of Networks and Security, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 30-41, 2025. https://doi.org/10.55640/ijns-05-02-02

M. Lopez and A. Singh, "The Future of Penetration Testing with AI Integration," Cyber Security Research Journal, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 110-125, 2020.

Download and View Statistics

Views: 0   |   Downloads: 0

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Johnathan R. Mitchell. (2025). Advanced Security and Stability Analysis in Modern Android and IoT Systems: Integrating Automated Penetration Testing, Machine Learning, and Control Techniques. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(11), 239–243. Retrieved from https://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajet/article/view/7084