Practical Approaches to Enhancing Disaster Resilience of Engineering Structures
Abdul Subhan Mohammed , Building Inspector Springfield, Massachusetts, United States.Abstract
The article examines the problem of enhancing the resilience of engineering structures to the consequences of natural and technological disasters amid the growing frequency and scale of extreme events. The relevance of the study is determined by the global increase in the number of disasters, significant economic losses, and the need to identify structural and organizational-technological solutions that ensure the functional continuity of critical infrastructure. The paper tries to systematize and analyze practical measures that were directed toward lowering the vulnerability of engineering assets via risk-oriented planning, and creative design concepts using new construction materials and technologies, together with wide operation and monitoring systems. The novelty of the work is in the incorporation of engineering, organizational, and institutional solutions within one unified risk-management framework, which would enable the possibility of matching technical effectiveness with economic feasibility as well as social expectations. The major deliverables comprise an elaborate risk forecasting wherein safe-to-fail as well as fail-safe concepts are described; seismic isolation plus aerodynamic optimizations; high-strength and composite reinforcement, self-healing connections including nano-modified cementitious matrices, as well as digital twins together with sensor systems and predictive analytics algorithms. This combination of tools not only reduces aggregate disaster losses but also preserves key infrastructure functions under the increasing uncertainty of the 21st century. The article will be helpful for engineers, researchers, risk-management specialists, and developers of infrastructure policy.
Keywords
resilience of engineering structures, risk-oriented planning, innovative materials, digital twins
References
Alkhatib, F., Kasim, N., Goh, W. I., Shafiq, N., Amran, M., Kotov, E. V., & Albaom, M. A. (2022). Computational Aerodynamic Optimization of Wind-Sensitive Irregular Tall Buildings. Buildings, 12(7), 939. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12070939
Ansal, A. (2025). Seismic microzonation: past, present, and future. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 23, 3483–3506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-025-02182-1
Banerjee, C., Bevere, L., Ewald, M., Lindgren, E., & Puttaiah, M. H. (2025, April 29). sigma 1/2025: Natural catastrophes: insured losses on trend to USD 145 billion in 2025. Swiss Re Institute. https://www.swissre.com/institute/research/sigma-research/sigma-2025-01-natural-catastrophes-trend.html
Cortes, F. R. (n.d.). CAPRA Initiative: Integrating Disaster Risk Information Into Development Policies and Programs in Latin America and the Caribbean. CAPRA. Retrieved August 1, 2025, from https://ecapra.org/sites/default/files/documents/CAPRA%20Initiative%20Integrating%20disaster%20risk%20into%20development%20policies%20in%20LATAM.pdf
FEMA. (2025). Using Hazus for Mitigation Planning. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_using-hazus-for-mitigation-planning_6.1.pdf
Ghafar, W. A., Zhong, T., Lai, Z., Pingle, Z., Yang, Y., & Hasan, M. M. (2025). Seismic isolation for existing structures: a review of retrofitting techniques, case studies, and trends. Discover Civil Engineering, 2(137). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-025-00300-1
Kim, Y., Carvalhaes, T., Helmrich, A., Markolf, S., Hoff, R., Chester, M., Li, R., & Ahmad, N. (2022). Leveraging SETS' resilience capabilities for safe-to-fail infrastructure under climate change. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 54, 101153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101153
Li, W., Chang, Z., Han, M., Li, J., Jin, Q., & Liu, B. (2025). Seismic performance of multistory frames with novel self-centering friction SMA dampers. Scientific Reports, 15(21575). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08120-0
Lubloy, E. E., Kanagaraj, B., Anand, N., & Raj, S. R. (2025). Fire performance of concrete: A comparative study between cement concrete and geopolymer concrete & its application - A state-of-the-art review. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 11, 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2025.101212
Madrigal, A. (2009, November 20). Istanbul Opens World’s Largest Earthquake-Safe Building. Wired. https://www.wired.com/2009/11/worlds-largest-earthquake-safe-building/
Naughton, D. T., Tsavdaridis, K. D., Maraveas, C., & Nicolaou, A. (2017). Pushover Analysis of Steel Seismic Resistant Frames with Reduced Web Section and Reduced Beam Section Connections. Frontiers in Built Environment, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2017.00059
NIBS. (2023). 2023 Annual Report to the President of the United States. NIBS. https://nibs.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/NIBS_Annual-Report_2023.pdf
Niobium. (2021). Using High Performance Concrete Together With High Strength HRB500 Rebar For More Sustainable Buildings. Niobium. https://niobium.tech/-/media/niobiumtech/documentos/resource-center/ntusing-high-performance-concrete-together-with-high-strength-hbr500-rebar-for-more-sustainable-buil.pdf
Sealey, K. S., Andiroglu, E., Lamere, J., Sobczak, J., & Suraneni, P. (2021). Multifunctional Performance of Coastal Structures Based on South Florida Coastal Environs. Journal of Coastal Research, 37(3), 656–669. https://doi.org/10.2112/jcoastres-d-20-00068.1
Swiss Re Group. (2024, November 11). Flood risk: protective measures are up to ten times more cost-effective than rebuilding. Swiss Re Group. https://www.swissre.com/press-release/Flood-risk-protective-measures-up-to-ten-times-more-cost-effective-than-rebuilding/a072a643-43b8-40e1-be62-31aa82bbc42f
The University of Manchester. (2021). High-Performance Graphene Enhanced Cement: A Revolutionary Innovation in Low-Carbon Manufacturing Process. The University of Manchester. https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/impacts/high-performance-graphene-enhanced-cement-a-revolutionary-innovat
UNDRR. (n.d.). Engaging with stakeholders. UNDRR. Retrieved August 5, 2025, from https://www.undrr.org/engaging-with-stakeholders
UNDRR. (2022, April). Humanity’s broken risk perception is reversing global progress in a “spiral of self-destruction”, finds a new UN report. UNDRR. https://www.undrr.org/news/humanitys-broken-risk-perception-reversing-global-progress-spiral-self-destruction-finds-new
World Bank Group. (2025, June 25). Insurance and Disaster Risk Finance. World Bank; World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/financialsector/brief/insurance-and-disaster-risk-finance
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdul Subhan Mohammed

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.