The convergence of large language models (LLMs) and quantum computing has the potential to revolutionize software development for quantum optimization tasks. AI-assisted code generation, powered by models like OpenAI Codex, can accelerate the design of quantum algorithms by automating routine coding tasks and democratizing access to quantum programming. However, this innovation introduces a web of ethical, legal, and technical challenges. This paper investigates the implications of using LLMs to generate quantum code, focusing on intellectual property (IP) concerns, the risk of unintended outcomes, legal ambiguity, and dual-use scenarios. We propose an ethical architecture for responsible AI-assisted development, incorporating human-in-the-loop systems, license-compliance mechanisms, and auditing tools. Case studies illustrate potential failures in code correctness, security, and attribution. We conclude with recommendations for explainable AI systems, curated datasets, and governance models that ensure innovation without sacrificing safety or compliance. By addressing these concerns proactively, the community can guide LLM-powered quantum development toward a responsible future.

Quantum Code Generation, Large Language Models (LLMs), Quantum Computing, Optimization, AI Ethics, Intellectual Property, Code Safety, Human-in-the-Loop, Software Licensing, Explainable AI

D. R. Mello Jr., “Insights from the Pending Copilot Class Action Lawsuit,” Bloomberg Law, Oct. 2023. https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/insights-from-the-pending-copilot-class-action-lawsuit.html

P. Mortimer, “GitHub Copilot: AI-Coding Assistant Redefining IP Rights,” LogicalCube Blog, Sep. 2023. https://www.logicalcube.com/github-copilot-ai-coding-assistant-ip-rights/

G. Appel, J. Neelbauer, and D. A. Schweidel, “Generative AI Has an Intellectual Property Problem,” Harvard Business Review, Apr. 7, 2023.

J. Black, “5 Ways to Reduce GitHub Copilot Security and Legal Risks,” FOSSA Blog, Oct. 2023.

https://www.fossa.com/blog/github-copilot-security-and-legal-risks/

Y. Fu et al., “Security Weaknesses of Copilot Generated Code in GitHub,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2310.02059, Oct. 2023.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02059

S. Buchholz and B. Ammanath, “Quantum Computing May Create Ethical Risks,” Deloitte Insights, March 2023. https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/focus/tech-trends/2023/quantum-computing-ethical-risks.html

U.S. Copyright Office, “Policy Guidance on Works Generated by Artificial Intelligence,” 2023.

https://www.copyright.gov/ai/ai-guidance.pdf

T. L. Massie et al., “Code Reuse in Machine-Learned Programming Tools,” ACM Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 49, no. 2, Apr. 2023.

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3573123

B. F. Mennen, “Software Licensing in the AI Era: What LLMs Must Consider,” J. IP Law & Practice, vol. 18, 2023. https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article/18/1/1/7032692

A. Mitra and R. Sundaram, “Limitations of Training LLMs on Public Repositories,” in Proc. AI Ethics Conf., 2023.

https://www.aieconf.org/papers/2023/llm-training-limitations/

D. Krug et al., “License Mismatches in Code Completion Models,” in Proc. ACM Conf. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT), 2023. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3593013.3594059

GitHub, “Copilot Filters and Indemnification Policy,” GitHub Docs, 2023.

https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/using-github-copilot/copilot-safety-and-security

ScanCode Toolkit, “License Detection for Compliance,” OpenLogic, 2023. https://scancode-toolkit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/license.html

N. Killoran, “Benchmarking Quantum Optimization Algorithms,” Quantum Research, 2022.

https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2022-07-25-756/

E. K. Das and L. Zhou, “Privacy Risks in Hybrid Quantum Systems,” in Quantum DataConf, 2023. https://quantumdataconf.org/2023/papers/privacy-hybrid-systems/

K. Binns, “Bias in Optimization Objectives: From Classical to Quantum,” J. Algorithmic Ethics, vol. 5, 2023. https://jaethics.org/articles/bias-quantum-optimization-2023

K. Bratus et al., “Code Provenance for Trustworthy LLMs,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2309.02191, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02191

Z. Ji, P. Ma, Z. Li, and S. Wang, “Benchmarking and Explaining Large Language Model-Based Code Generation: A Causality-Centric Approach,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2310.12903, Oct. 2023.

R. Nathan and C. Bae, “Open Repositories for Ethical Quantum AI Training,” Quantum Ethics J., vol. 1, 2023. https://quantumethicsjournal.org/2023/open-data-ai/

European Commission, “Transport and Anti-Discrimination Logistics Guidelines,” Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, 2023.

https://transport.ec.europa.eu/publications/transport-anti-discrimination-guidelines-2023_en

A. Klenk et al., “Value Sensitive Algorithm Design in Quantum Systems,” Ethics in AI Journal, vol. 4, 2023. https://ethicsinaijournal.org/articles/2023/quantum-values/