★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
editor@theamericanjournals.comPublisher Home ↗
Engineering and Technology OPEN ACCESS

COMPARISON OF MPPT ALGORITHMS FOR PV SYSTEM USING SINGLE DIODE AND THEVENIN EQUIVALENT MODELS

Ali Haider Dahash
Al-Nahrain University College of Engineering Electronic and Communications Engineering, Iraq
Anas Lateef Mahmood
Al-Nahrain University College of Engineering Electronic and Communications Engineering, Iraq
DOI Crossref DOI 10.37547/tajet/Volume04Issue04-03
tajet 2022
VOL. 4 / NO. 04 APRIL
FULL TEXT PP. 17-35
DOWNLOAD PDF

View all articles in this issue ↗

VOLUME 4
ISSUE 04
YEAR 2022
PAGES 17-35
RESEARCH OVERVIEW

Abstract

Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithms are significant in PV systems due to they reduce the PV panels number that necessary to reach the target output power, lowering the PV array expense. This research gives a simulated comparison of two essential MPPT techniques, incremental conductance (IC) and perturb and observe (P&O) utilizing single diode and Thevenin comparable models. The essential parameters involving voltage, current, and power output were traced for both methods using a DC-DC boost converter. The results of stimulation revealed that for the two tracking algorithms the single diode module gives higher output power in comparison with the Thevenin equivalent model but for the IC algorithm the Thevenin equivalent model gives less output signals ripple.

RESEARCH TOPICS

Keywords

Photovoltaic (PV), Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT),

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
SOURCES & SCHOLARSHIP

References

  1. D. P. Hohm, M. E. Ropp, “Comparative Study of Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms Using an Experimental, Programmable, Maximum Power Point Tracking Test Bed”, Conference Record of the Twenty-Eighth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 15-22 Sept. 2000, pp. 1699-1702.
  2. A. Ismael Nusaif and A. Lateef Mahmood, “MPPT Algorithms (PSO, FA, and MFA) for PV System under Partial Shading Condition, Case Study: BTS in Algazalia, Baghdad”, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SMART GRID, Vol.4, No.3, September, 2020.
  3. Bahaa Abdulkhailq Numan, Amina Mahmoud Shakir, Anas Lateef Mahmood,“ Photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking via modified perturbation and observation algorithm”, International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive System (IJPEDS), Vol. 11, No. 4, December 2020, pp. 2007~2018.
  4. Hairul Nissah Zainudin, Saad Mekhilef, “Comparison Study of Maximum Power Point Tracker Techniques for PV Systems,” Proc. 14th International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON‟10), Cairo University, Egypt, 2010, 750-755.
  5. Trishan Esram, and Patrick L. Chapman, “Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum PowerPoint Tracking Techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 22 (2), 2007, 439-449.
  6. D. Haji and N. Genc, “Fuzzy and P&O Based MPPT Controllers under Different Conditions”, 7th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), Paris, France, pp. 649-655, 14-17 Oct. 2018.
  7. H. S. Rauschenbach, “Solar Cell Array Design Handbook”. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1980.