★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
manuscript.tajas@theamericanjournals.com Publisher Home ↗
Applied Sciences OPEN ACCESS

Developing an Enterprise Computing Transformation Model to Strengthen Fault Tolerance and Dynamic Resource Allocation

Dr. Emre Yılmaz
Department of Applied Sciences, Anatolian Institute of Technology, Ankara, Turkey
DOI Crossref DOI 10.37547/tajas/Volume08Issue11-01
tajas 2026
VOL. 8 / NO. 11 NOVEMBER
FULL TEXT PP. 01-20
DOWNLOAD PDF

View all articles in this issue ↗

VOLUME 8
ISSUE 11
YEAR 2026
PAGES 01-20
RESEARCH OVERVIEW

Abstract

Enterprise computing environments increasingly operate across interconnected applications, distributed services, cloud infrastructure, data-processing pipelines, and security platforms. Although these technologies provide opportunities for greater flexibility and operational efficiency, they also introduce interdependencies that complicate fault management, workload distribution, capacity planning, and service continuity. Traditional infrastructure management approaches frequently treat reliability engineering and resource optimization as separate operational concerns. Such separation can produce conflicting decisions: a resource-allocation mechanism may maximize utilization while reducing redundancy, whereas a fault-recovery mechanism may preserve availability by maintaining excessive idle capacity. Developing an integrated transformation model that coordinates fault tolerance, dynamic resource allocation, observability, security, and architectural modernization is therefore an important enterprise computing challenge.

This research develops a conceptual Enterprise Computing Transformation Model (ECTM) intended to improve operational resilience while enabling responsive allocation of computing resources. The model combines six interrelated capabilities: workload and dependency assessment; modular architecture transformation; continuous observability and risk assessment; resilience-oriented execution and recovery; adaptive resource allocation; and governance-driven continuous improvement. These capabilities operate through a feedback mechanism that connects application performance, workload demand, infrastructure utilization, dependency health, recovery readiness, and security requirements. Rather than treating cloud adoption as a simple relocation of existing workloads, the proposed model conceptualizes transformation as a coordinated process involving architecture, operational controls, resource policies, and organizational governance.

The research adopts a conceptual design methodology based on thematic synthesis of the 33 references supplied by the researcher. The literature provides complementary perspectives on cloud computing, microservices, enterprise integration, identity management, artificial intelligence infrastructure, data pipelines, service reliability engineering, clustering, risk management, and security governance. These perspectives inform the development of a layered architectural model and a set of decision principles for balancing reliability and resource efficiency. Particular attention is given to the relationship between workload classification, dependency-aware scheduling, controlled scaling, health-based traffic management, automated recovery, and capacity reserves. The model also considers the operational consequences of partial failures, correlated infrastructure disruptions, delayed telemetry, resource contention, and inaccurate predictive decisions.

A central contribution is the formulation of a reliability-constrained allocation principle: computing resources should be assigned according to observed and anticipated demand, service criticality, recovery requirements, and acceptable risk rather than utilization objectives alone. Under this principle, scaling decisions are evaluated against service-level objectives, minimum redundancy requirements, security constraints, and recovery capacity. The framework distinguishes horizontal and vertical scaling, reactive and predictive allocation, replication and failover, and local recovery and dependency-wide recovery. It further proposes a staged transformation pathway that begins with baseline assessment and dependency mapping, proceeds through workload decomposition and controlled migration, and culminates in automated optimization supported by continuous validation.

The expected analytical contribution is a unified structure for examining how enterprise architecture and operational decision-making jointly influence resilience and resource efficiency. The framework provides measurable evaluation dimensions, including service availability, recovery time, recovery-point compliance, resource utilization, scaling latency, workload completion time, incident frequency, and operational cost. However, these measures are proposed evaluation criteria rather than observed results. The model requires empirical validation through controlled experiments, production telemetry, or comparative case studies before its effectiveness can be quantified. Its practical value lies in providing enterprises with a structured basis for designing, evaluating, and governing computing transformations in environments where service continuity, workload variability, security, and efficient resource use must be achieved simultaneously.

RESEARCH TOPICS

Keywords

Enterprise computing fault tolerance dynamic resource allocation cloud transformation microservices architecture adaptive scheduling site reliability engineering observability infrastructure resilience risk-aware automation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
SOURCES & SCHOLARSHIP

References

  1. Adabala, P. K. (2026). Best Practices for Enterprise System Integration in Modern Organizations. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 11, 1137-1146.
  2. Ambalakannu, M. (2026). Streamlined claims adjudication: Observability-driven dashboard intelligence. International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering, Technology and Management, 9(1), 231–235.
  3. Ambati, K. C. (2026). Modular ticketing and issue resolution framework embedded within procurement suites. International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering, Technology and Management, 9(1), 795–800.
  4. Chaba, A. (2021). API-driven enterprise commerce architecture for composable digital ecosystems. International Journal of Engineering & Extended Technologies Research, 3(6), 4082–4086.
  5. Challa, R. (2023). Engineering AI Factories: Scalable HPC Design Patterns for Next-Generation Foundation Model Infrastructure. International Journal of Computer Technology and Electronics Communication, 6(4), 7342-7351.
  6. Dasari, H. (2025, October). Site reliability engineering practices for error budget management in large-scale systems. International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 38(5s), 991–1001.
  7. Gandhi, S. T. (2026). Multimodal trust signals for AI-mediated communication: Detecting inconsistency, deception, and synthetic content across audio, video, and text. International Journal of Future Innovative Science and Technology (IJFIST), 9(3), 879–891.
  8. Gentyala, R. (2022). Beyond the Algorithm: A Longitudinal Analysis of Data Heterogeneity and Clinician Trust as Determinants of Predictive Tool Adoption and Patient Outcomes in Personalized Medicine. International Journal of AI, BigData, Computational and Management Studies, 3(2), 137-168.
  9. Gollapudi, R. (2026, April). An Automated Risk Scoring Framework for SQL Execution Plan Analysis and Performance Regression Detection in Oracle Database Systems. In 2026 International Conference on Multidisciplinary Innovations For Smart & Sustainable Future (MISSF) (pp. 01-06). IEEE.
  10. Gowda, M. K. S. (2026). Optimizing regulatory compliance with machine learning: Boosting accuracy and efficiency. International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations (IJRAI), 9(1), 13686–13690.
  11. ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information Security, Cybersecurity and Privacy Protection — Information Security Management Systems — Requirements, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
  12. Jayaraman, S., Rajendran, S., & P, S. P. (2019). Fuzzy c-means clustering and elliptic curve cryptography using privacy preserving in cloud. International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining, 15(3), 273-287.
  13. Khan, M. F., Mubasher, M. M., Khan, W. A., Shabbir, G., & Saqib, S. (2024). Systematic Literature Review to Explore use of VR in Transportation Research to Study Driver Behavior. Journal of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 2(2).
  14. Kothokatta, L. (2023). AI-Augmented Quality Engineering for MLOps: Intelligent Test Orchestration and Model Reliability on AWS. International Journal of Computer Technology and Electronics Communication, 6(4), 7324-7330.
  15. Meesala, L. K. (2023). Modern security information and event management: Architecture, analytics pipelines, and empirical evaluation of SOC-scale threat detection. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJSRCSEIT), ISSN, 2456-3307.
  16. P. Mell and T. Grance, The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing, NIST Special Publication 800-145, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2011 Edition.
  17. Mudusu, S. K. (2024). Designing self-healing data pipelines for autonomous and continuous AI operations. Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications, 33(2), 1238-1247.
  18. S. Moreschini et al., “AI Techniques in the Microservices Life-Cycle: A Systematic Mapping Study,” arXiv:2305.16092, 2023.
  19. Namdeo, A. (2023). Generative synthetic data pipelines for bias-free BI training. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Science and Information Technology (IJAESIT), 6(1), 10818–10826. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJAESIT.2023.0601003
  20. Narayanan, S. (2024). Enterprise technology risk management framework: An integrated approach to cloud-native security, AI governance, and compliance automation. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10(1), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT2612126
  21. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0), 2023.
  22. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Zero Trust Architecture, NIST Special Publication 800-207, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2020.
  23. V. Nitin, S. Asthana, B. Ray, and R. Krishna, “CARGO: AI-Guided Dependency Analysis for Migrating Monolithic Applications to Microservices Architecture,” arXiv:2207.11784, 2022.
  24. Panyala, V. R. (2023). AI-augmented DevOps frameworks for accelerating cloud-native platform engineering at scale. International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations, 6(1), 8375–8379.
  25. Patel, M., & Korat, U. (2026, February). Swarm Optimization Algorithm-Enhanced Clustering Techniques for Reliable Wireless Sensor Networks Communication. In 2026 IEEE 5th International Conference on AI in Cybersecurity (ICAIC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
  26. Raja, G. V. (2020). Metadata gets a makeover: The machine learning approach. International Journal of Computer Technology and Electronics Communication, 3(6), 2900-2903.
  27. Raja, G. V. (2023). AI Driven Secure Intelligent Framework for Fraud Detection Cybersecurity and Cloud Based Enterprise Systems. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science & Technology (IJARCST), 6(5), 9068-9076.
  28. Rajula, A. (2022). Cloud-based virtual patient engagement with intelligent scheduling and secure document management. International Journal of Future Innovative Science and Technology, 5(5), 9233–9245.
  29. Sharma, Ankit and Mulgund, Pavankumar and Srivastava, Adarsh and Agrawal, Lavlin, Beyond Cryptocurrency: There’s More to Blockchain (January 07, 2020). Beyond Cryptocurrency: There's More to Blockchain," Amplify, Cutter Consortium, January 7, 2020., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6098906 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6098906
  30. Subramani, V. (2024). Dynamic scaling in e-commerce platforms: Microservices for latency, compliance, and resilience. Computer Fraud and Security, 2024(11). https://computerfraudsecurity.com/index.php/journal/article/view/879
  31. Subramanyam, S. P. (2023). Secure identity and access management frameworks for cloud native DevOps systems. International Journal of Computer Technology and Electronics Communication, 6(4), 7357–7366.
  32. Suddala, V. R. A. K. V. (2026). Telecom innovation in action: Modernizing Spectrum Mobile for growth and compliance. International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering, Technology and Management, 9(1), 237–242.
  33. Vas, M. R. (2026). Towards Self Evolving Cloud and AI Systems for Autonomous Cybersecurity Intelligent Data Engineering Enterprise and Healthcare Resilience. International Journal of Future Innovative Science and Technology (IJFIST), 9(1), 160.