Intelligent Computational Systems for Scientific Problems: Principles, Methodologies, and Intricate Data Classification

The increasing complexity, dimensionality, and dynamical nature of scientific and engineering problems have created a growing demand for computational systems capable of learning from data, representing nonlinear relationships, solving optimization problems, and supporting decision-making under uncertainty. Intelligent computational systems integrate concepts from machine learning, neural computation, optimization, distributed computing, signal processing, control theory, and scientific computing to address problems that are difficult to solve through conventional analytical techniques alone. This review examines the theoretical foundations, methodological development, and application-oriented characteristics of such systems, with particular emphasis on neural architectures, deep learning, recurrent computation, intelligent optimization, adaptive control, distributed computation, and data classification. The analysis synthesizes the supplied literature to establish a coherent framework connecting foundational learning models with contemporary scientific and engineering applications.

The reviewed literature demonstrates that intelligent computation has evolved from relatively compact neural models toward multilayer, recurrent, distributed, and hybrid computational architectures. Early developments in deep learning established mechanisms for learning hierarchical representations, while recurrent and complex-valued neural models expanded computational learning toward temporal, dynamic, and mathematically structured problems (Hochreiter and Schmidhuber, 1997; Hinton et al., 2006; Bengio, 2009; LeCun et al., 2015). Subsequent work has demonstrated that intelligent algorithms can also be integrated with optimization and control mechanisms to solve time-varying systems, robotic motion problems, portfolio-selection problems, engineering prediction tasks, and infrastructure-management problems. In parallel, cloud and volunteer distributed computing have demonstrated how computational resources can be reorganized to address scientific workloads that exceed the practical capabilities of individual systems (Armbrust et al., 2010; Beberg et al., 2009).

A central finding of this synthesis is that intelligent computational systems should not be understood solely as predictive models. Their broader value lies in their capacity to create computational representations of complex relationships and to connect perception, prediction, optimization, control, and decision processes. Neural networks can provide nonlinear approximation and representation learning; recurrent architectures can model temporal dependencies; optimization algorithms can search complex solution spaces; and distributed computational environments can provide the resources required for large-scale processing. Applications in wind-energy estimation, grounding-system design, robotic manipulation, nonlinear landslide prediction, visual tracking, financial optimization, and dynamic equation solving illustrate the breadth of this paradigm (Deng et al., 2020; Hu et al., 2019a, 2021; Huang et al., 2022; Khan et al., 2020a, 2022a).

The literature also reveals important limitations. Computational intelligence does not automatically guarantee interpretability, stability, generalization, or computational efficiency. Increasing model complexity may introduce substantial resource requirements, while optimization-driven approaches can remain sensitive to initialization, parameter selection, problem formulation, and noise. Deep and language-oriented systems additionally raise concerns regarding computational scale and responsible deployment (Bender et al., 2021). Consequently, future intelligent scientific systems are likely to depend on hybrid architectures that combine learned representations with mathematical constraints, optimization procedures, domain knowledge, distributed infrastructure, and stability-aware control. Such integration can provide a more systematic foundation for reliable computational intelligence across scientific and engineering domains.

Computational intelligence, Neural networks, Deep learning, Machine learning, Intelligent optimization, Recurrent neural networks, Scientific computing, Data classification, Nonlinear systems, Engineering applications

Armbrust M, Fox A, Griffith R, Joseph AD, Katz R, Konwinski A, Lee G, Patterson D, Rabkin A, Stoica I, et al. A view of cloud computing. Commun ACM. 2010;53(4):50–58.

Beberg AL, Ensign DL, Jayachandran G, Khaliq S, Pande VS. Folding@home: Lessons from eight years of volunteer distributed computing. Paper presented at: IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing; 2009 May 3–29; Rome, Italy. p. 1–8.

Bender EM, Gebru T, McMillan-Major A, Shmitchell S. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Paper presented at: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2021; Virtual Event, Canada; p. 610–623.

Bengio Y. Learning deep architectures for AI. Mach Learn. 2009;2(1):1–127.

Bengio Y, Glorot X, Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics; 2010 May 13–15; Chia Laguna Resort, Sardinia, Italy. p. 249–256.

Caulfield HJ, Dolev S. Why future supercomputing requires optics. Nat Photonics. 2010;4(5):261–263.

Deng X, Yang J, Sun Y, Song D, Yang Y, Joo Y. H. (2020). An effective wind speed estimation based extended optimal torque control for maximum wind energy capture. IEEE Access 8, 65959–65969. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984654.

Deng X, Yang J, Sun Y, Song D, Yang Y, Joo Y. H. (2020). An effective wind speed estimation based extended optimal torque control for maximum wind energy capture. IEEE Access 8, 65959–65969. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984654.

Ding B, Li X, Li Y. (2022). Configuration design and experimental verification of a variable constant-force compliant mechanism. Robotica 40, 3463–3475. doi: 10.1017/S0263574722000340.

Ding B, Yang Z, Xiao X, Zhang G. (2019a). Design of reconfigurable planar micro-positioning stages based on function modules. IEEE Access 7, 15102–15112. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2894619.

Ding B, Zhao J, Li Y. (2021). Design of a spatial constant-force end-effector for polishing/deburring operations. Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Technol. 116, 3507–3515. doi: 10.1007/s00170-021-07579-1.

Ding L, She J, Peng S. (2013). An integrated prediction model for network traffic based on wavelet transformation. Elektronika ir elektrotechnika 19, 73–76. doi: 10.5755/j01.eee.19.3.3700.

Ding L, Xiao L, Zhou K, Lan Y, Zhang Y. (2018). A new RNN model with a modified nonlinear activation function applied to complex-valued linear equations. IEEE Access 6, 62954–62962. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2876665.

Ding L, Xiao L, Zhou K, Lan Y, Zhang Y, Li J. (2019b). An improved complex-valued recurrent neural network model for time-varying complex-valued Sylvester equation. IEEE Access 7, 19291–19302. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2896983.

Ding L, Zeng H, Wang W, Yu F. (2014). Improved stability criteria of static recurrent neural networks with a time-varying delay. Sci. World J. 2014, 391282. doi: 10.1155/2014/391282.

Ethayarajh K. How contextual are contextualized word representations? Comparing the geometry of bert, elmo, and gpt-2 embeddings. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). Association for Computational Linguistics; 2019. Hong Kong, China. p. 55–65.

Han L, He Y, Liao B, Hua C. (2023). An accelerated double-integral ZNN with resisting linear noise for dynamic Sylvester equation solving and its application to the control of the SFM chaotic system. Axioms 12, 287. doi: 10.3390/axioms12030287.

Hinton GE, Osindero S, Teh Y-W. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput. 2006;18(7):1527–1554.

Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 1997;9(8):1735–1780.

Hu H, Fang M, Hu F, Zeng S, Deng X. (2021). A new design of substation grounding based on electrolytic cathodic protection and on transfer corrosion current. Electric Power Syst. Res. 195, 107174. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107174.

Hu H, Luo R, Fang M, Zeng S, Hu F. (2019a). A new optimization design for grounding grid. Int. J. Electrical Power Energy Syst. 108, 61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.12.041.

Hu K, He W, Ye J, Zhao L, Peng H, Pi J. (2019b). Online visual tracking of weighted multiple instance learning via neutrosophic similarity-based objectness estimation. Symmetry 11, 832. doi: 10.3390/sym11060832.

Huang Z, Dong M, Du X, Guan Y. (2022). A nonlinear prediction model of antislide pile top displacement based on MIC-SVR for jurassic landslides. Adv. Civil Eng. 2022, 9101234. doi: 10.1155/2022/9101234.

Jia L, Xiao L, Dai J, Qi Z, Zhang Z, Zhang Y. (2021). Design and application of an adaptive fuzzy control strategy to zeroing neural network for solving time-variant QP problem. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 29, 1544–1555. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.2981001.

Jin J, Yu F. (2013). Novel current-reuse current-mirror and its application on 2.4-GHz down-conversion mixer. Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 55, 2520–2524. doi: 10.1002/mop.27878.

Jin J, Zhou K, Zhao L. (2017a). Designing RF ring oscillator using current-mode technology. IEEE Access 5, 5306–5312. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2692771.

Jin L, Li S, Xiao L, Lu R, Liao B. (2017b). Cooperative motion generation in a distributed network of redundant robot manipulators with noises. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. Syst. 48, 1715–1724. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2017.2693400.

Katsikis V. N, Mourtas S. D. (2021). “Portfolio insurance and intelligent algorithms,” in Computational Management: Applications of Computational Intelligence in Business Management (Springer), 305–323. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-72929-5_14.

Katsikis V. N, Mourtas S. D, Stanimirović P. S, Li S, Cao X. (2021). “Time-varying mean-variance portfolio selection under transaction costs and cardinality constraint problem via beetle antennae search algorithm (BAS),” in Operations Research Forum, Vol. 2 (Springer), 1–26. doi: 10.1007/s43069-021-00060-5.

Katsikis V. N, Stanimirović P. S, Mourtas S. D, Xiao L, Stanujkić D, Karabašević D. (2023). Zeroing neural network based on neutrosophic logic for calculating minimal-norm least-squares solutions to time-varying linear systems. Neural Process. Lett. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3171715-7.

Khan A. H, Cao X, Li S, Katsikis V. N, Liao L. (2020a). BAS-Adam: an Adam based approach to improve the performance of beetle antennae search optimizer. IEEE/CAA J. Automat. Sin. 7, 461–471. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2020.1003048.

Khan A. H, Cao X, Li S, Luo C. (2020b). Using social behavior of beetles to establish a computational model for operational management. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 7, 492–502. doi: 10.1109/TCSS.2019.2958522.

Khan A. H, Li S, Cao X. (2021). Tracking control of redundant manipulator under active remote center-of-motion constraints: an RNN-based metaheuristic approach. Sci. China Inform. Sci. 64, 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11432-019-2735-6.

Khan A. T, Cao X, Brajevic I, Stanimirovic P. S, Katsikis V. N, Li S. (2022a). Non-linear activated beetle antennae search: a novel technique for non-convex tax-aware portfolio optimization problem. Expert Syst. Appl. 197, 116631. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116631.

Khan A. T, Cao X, Li S. (2022b). Dual beetle antennae search system for optimal planning and robust control of 5-link biped robots. J. Comput. Sci. 60, 101556. doi: 10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101556.

Khan A. T, Cao X, Li S, Katsikis V. N, Brajevic I, Stanimirovic P. S. (2022c). Fraud detection in publicly traded US firms using beetle antennae search: a machine learning approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 191, 116148. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116148.

Khan A. T, Cao X, Liao B, Francis A. (2022d). Bio-inspired machine learning for distributed confidential multi-portfolio selection problem. Biomimetics 7, 124. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics7030124.

Khan A. T, Li S, Cao X. (2022e). Human guided cooperative robotic agents in smart home using beetle antennae search. Sci. China Inform. Sci. 65, 122204. doi: 10.1007/s11432-020-3073-5.

LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature 2015;521(7553):436–444.

Lepikhin D, Lee HJ, Xu Y, Chen D, Firat O, Huang Y, Krikun M, Shazeer N, Chen Z. Gshard: Scaling giant models with conditional computation and automatic sharding. arXiv. 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.16668

Poole D, Mackworth A, Goebel R. Computational intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.

Schmidhuber J. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Netw. 2015;61:85–117.