Applied Sciences | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajas/Volume08Issue05-31

Fact-Checking Technologies Against Fake News and Disinformation: International Practices and Their Application in Uzbekistan's Online Media

Abstract

The article proposes a five-layer model of fact-checking and digital verification for Uzbekistan's online media. The model positions fact-checking as a continuous newsroom function that combines monitoring, open-source investigation, deepfake verification, transparent publication and preventive media literacy.

Keywords

Fact-checking, disinformation, fake news

References

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policymaking. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Ireton, C., & Posetti, J. (Eds.). (2018). Journalism, 'Fake News' & Disinformation: Handbook for Journalism Education and Training. Paris: UNESCO.

Graves, L. (2016). Deciding What's True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

Uscinski, J. E., & Butler, R. W. (2013). The epistemology of fact checking. Critical Review, 25(2), 162-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2013.843872

International Fact-Checking Network. (n.d.). IFCN Code of Principles: The commitments. Poynter Institute.

Reuters. (n.d.). About Reuters Fact Check; Reuters Journalistic Standards.

European Digital Media Observatory. (n.d.). EDMO fact-checking activities; Monthly Briefs & Best-of Map.

Bellingcat. (2021). A Beginner's Guide to Social Media Verification; Bellingcat Online Investigation Toolkit.

Silverman, C. (Ed.). (2014). Verification Handbook: A Definitive Guide to Verifying Digital Content for Emergency Coverage. European Journalism Centre.

Google Search Central. (n.d.). Fact check (ClaimReview) structured data; Google Fact Check Tools APIs.

Zlatkova, D., Nakov, P., & Koychev, I. (2019). Fact-Checking Meets Fauxtography: Verifying Claims About Images. arXiv:1908.11722.

Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity. (n.d.). C2PA Specifications; Verifying Media Content Sources.

Chesney, R., & Citron, D. (2019). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. California Law Review, 107(6), 1753-1820.

Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020). Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news. Social Media + Society, 6(1), 1-13.

Kun.uz. (2025, June 26). Authorities warn of deepfake videos promoting Russian army enlistment.

Factchecker.uz. (n.d.). Home page and About us.

Factcheck.uz. (n.d.). About the project and Home page.

UNESCO. (2020). UNESCO raises awareness on fake information in Uzbekistan; UNESCO promotes media and information literacy to support media development in Uzbekistan.

European External Action Service. (2025). Digital Detectives project launches fact-checking training and a fact-checking club in Uzbekistan.

Batafsil.uz, Repost.uz, UzDaily.uz, and Kun.uz. Reports on AI-generated scams, deepfakes and synthetic media cases in Uzbekistan, 2023-2026.

Download and View Statistics

Views: 0   |   Downloads: 0

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Bakhodir Khasanov Firdavsiy ugli. (2026). Fact-Checking Technologies Against Fake News and Disinformation: International Practices and Their Application in Uzbekistan’s Online Media. The American Journal of Applied Sciences, 8(5), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajas/Volume08Issue05-31