The qualifications, competence and diligence of judges play a very important role in the administration of justice, since these features of judges determine the effectiveness of the trial and the attitude of others towards the judge as a whole. Therefore, in almost all courts of the world, in one form or another, the activities of judges are studied and evaluated to determine their compliance with the above requirements.

The judiciary, their training, judicial ethics and evaluation of the activities of judges

Adopted by the Seventh United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders held at Milan from 26 August to 6 September 1985 and endorsed by General Assembly resolutions 40/32 of 29 November 1985 and 40/146 of 13 December 1985. https://www.ohchr.org.

Recommendation CM/Rec (2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities. www.coe.int

https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/bangalore_principles.shtml

https://rm.coe.int/1680747dde

Opinion n° 17 (2014) on the evaluation of Judges' work, the quality of justice and respect for judicial independence https://rm.coe.int/16807481ea

Kyiv Recommendations on Judicial independence in Eastern Europe, South Caucasus and Central Asia - Judicial Administration, Selection and Accountability - Kyiv, 23-25 June 2010. P.27. Professional Evaluation of Judges. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/a/3/73487.pdf

Organic Law of Georgia on General Courts. LHG, 41, 08/12/2009. Article 362.

Organic Law of Georgia on General Courts. LHG, 41, 08/12/2009. Article 363.

"Methodological guide for assessing the professional activities of a judge" approved protocol decision of the Commission on the quality of justice under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan. September 16, 2019.