The Ways Of Improvement Of Activity Of Experts And Research Of Objects Of Expertise On Criminal Cases.
Astanov Istam Rustamovich , Professor Of The Academy Of The General Prosecutor's Office Of The Republic Of Uzbekistan Astanov Shuxrat Rustamovich , Judge For Civil Cases Of Yukori Chirchik Region, UzbekistanAbstract
The article deals with the development of the institution of expertise, improving the activities of experts. And also the issues of improving the criminal procedural legislation related to the institution of expertise are being considered.
Keywords
Expertise, Code Of Criminal Procedure, The Expert
References
Узбекский толковый словарь / под редакцией А.Мадвалиева. Т.2. – Ташкент: “Национальная энциклопедия Узбекистана ” Государственная научная редакция, 2006. – С.77.
Аверьянова Т.В. Интеграция и дифференциация научных знаний как источники и основы новых методов судебной экспертизы. – М.: Академия МВД России, 1994. – С.85.
Кирсанов З.И. Функции эксперта и специалиста в установлении обстоятельств уго¬ловного дела // Информационный бюллетень Академия управлении МВД России. – Москва, 1998. – № 6. – С.5.
Мирский Д.Я. Некоторые теоретические вопросы классификации объектов судебной экспертизы, их свойства и признаки // Сборник научных трудов. – M.: ВНИИСЭ, 1986. – С.55.
Аверьянова Т.В., Белкин Р.С., Корухов Ю.Г., Россинская Е.Р. Криминалистика: Учебник для вузов / Под. ред. Р.С. Белкина. – М.: НОРМА, 2002. – С. 90.
Белкин Р.С. Курс криминалистики. – М.: Норма, 1997. Т.3. – С. 67.
Аверьянова Т.В. Статкуса В.Ф. Эксперт. Руководство для экспертов органов внутренних дел. – М.: НОРМА, 2003. – С. 307.
Ростов М.Н. О содержании понятий, обозначаемы терминами «объект (экс¬пертизы, экспертного исследования)», «качество», «свойство» и «признак» // Методология судебной экспертизы. Сб. науч. статей. – М.: ВНИИСЭ, 1986. – С. 42.
Отахўжаев С.А. Эксперт хулосасининг далилий аҳамияти // Эксперт хулосаларининг далилий моҳияти: Республика идоралараро илмий-амалий конференция материаллари. – Тошкент, 2010. – Б. 3.
Пайзуллаев Қ.П. Зўрлик ишлатиб содир этиладиган жиноятлар. Ўқув қўлланма. – Тошкент: ТДЮИ, 2009. – Б. 71.
Yu.K. eagles use of special knowledge in criminal legal proceedings: Manual. Vyp. 1 . – M.: MGYuA, 2004. – Page 8.
Korenevsky Yu.V. Kriminalistika for judicial expertise. – M.: Yurid. litas, 2001. – Page 171-176.
Shepel V. N. Expertise in court on criminal cases in the light of the new legislation and prospects of its development: Avtoref. yew. ... edging. юрид. sciences. – M.: RGB, 2003. – Page 12.
Snetkov V.A. Activities of expert and criminalistic divisions of law-enforcement bodies for application of expert and criminalistic methods and means in disclosure and investigation of crimes: Manual. – M.: EKTs Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 1996. – Page 16. ; Zinin A.M. The criminalist in investigative actions: educational and practical grant. – M.: Right and law, 2004. – Page 11-12.
Yu.K. eagles the expert opinion and its assessment on criminal cases: Manual. – M.: Lawyer, 1995. – Page 5.
Harchenko D. A. Judicial expertise in the Russian criminal legal proceedings: Avtoref. yew. ... edging. юрид. sciences. – Irkutsk: East - the Siberian Ince. 2006. – Page 18.
Belkin R. S. Kriminalistika. Short encyclopedia. – M.: Bol. I grew. энциклоп. 1993. – Page 80.
Averyanova T.V. Contents and characteristic of methods judicial экспертых issledovakniya. – M.: NORM, 1994. – Page 175.
Kudryavtseva A.V. The conclusion and indications of the expert as a type of proofs in criminal trial of Russia//Actual problems of the theory and practice of criminal legal proceedings and criminalistics: Сб. articles конф. – M.: Academy of management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2004. – Page 55.
Kudryavtseva A.V. The conclusion and indications of the expert as a type of proofs in criminal trial of Russia//Actual problems of the theory and practice of criminal legal proceedings and criminalistics: Сб. articles конф. – M.: Academy of management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2004. – Page 56.
V. M. bulls the conclusion and the indication of the expert as a new type of proofs//Materials of the 2nd All-Russian scientific and practical conference on criminalistics and judicial expertise – M.: EKTs Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2004. – Page 75.
Goryanov I.I. Judicial expertise in modern criminal legal proceedings: legal regulation and law-enforcement practice: Avtoref. yew. … edging. юрид. sciences. – M.: RGB, 2006. – Page 55.
Bishmanov B. M. Ekspert and the expert in criminal legal proceedings. – M.: Mosk. psikhologo-social institute, 2003. – Page 38.
Zinin A.M. Omelyanyuk G.G., Pakhomov A.V. introduction in judicial expertise. – M.: MPSI, 2002. – Page 18.
Суд экспертизаси тўғрисидаги қонун. Халқ сўзи, № 108 (5023). 2010 йил 2 июнь. – Б. 3-4.
In addition to the rights and obligations of an expert, there are prohibited actions of an expert, which are reflected in Article 61 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Belarus, which is called an “expert”.
Ниязов М.К. Значение заключения экспертизы на стадии предварительного следствия // Эксперт хулосаларининг далилий моҳияти: Республика идоралараро илмий-амалий конференция материаллари. – Тошкент, 2010. – Б. 15.
Тошпўлатов А.И. Ёлғон гувоҳлик учун жиноий жавобгарлик муаммолари: Юрид. фан. номз. ... дисс. автореф. – Тошкент: ТДЮИ, 2008. – Б.13.
Нуриддинов А.И. Одам ДНКси суд биологик экспертизаси-жиноятларни очишда муҳим манба // Эксперт хулосаларининг далилий моҳияти: Республика идоралараро илмий-амалий конференция материаллари. – Тошкент, 2010. – Б. 48-49.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2021 The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.