★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
editor@theamericanjournals.comPublisher Home ↗
Articles OPEN ACCESS

Pre-Announcement Market Behavior: Evidence from Oil Trading Activity and Temporal Dislocation

Hasan Mohamed Husain Alaali
AIA, CPA, IPA Fellow Member
DOI Crossref DOI 10.37547/tajiir/Volume08Issue08-03
tajiir 2026
VOL. 8 / NO. 08 AUGUST
FULL TEXT PP. 24-49
DOWNLOAD PDF

View all articles in this issue ↗

VOLUME 8
ISSUE 08
YEAR 2026
PAGES 24-49
RESEARCH OVERVIEW

Abstract

Financial markets are generally viewed as information-driven systems in which trading activity and price adjustments follow the release of new information. Yet market behavior does not always conform neatly to this sequence. This study investigates a notable event in the oil futures market that occurred in March 2026, where unusually concentrated trading activity and price movements were observed approximately fifteen minutes before an official political announcement concerning Iran.

The event raises a fundamental question: can observable market behavior emerge before formal information enters the public domain? Existing explanations would typically point to information asymmetry, insider trading, or informed order flow. While such mechanisms remain relevant, they do not fully capture situations in which substantial market activity develops despite the absence of clearly identifiable public signals.

To explore this issue, the study draws on insights from behavioral economics, behavioral finance, market microstructure, and price discovery research [7–11,16,19]. It introduces the concept of Pre-Announcement Behavioral Dislocation (PABD), a framework that focuses on the temporal relationship between expectations, uncertainty, trading behavior, and formal information disclosure. The central argument is that market participants may react to evolving expectations, contextual developments, and perceived signals before information becomes formally confirmed, creating observable market effects ahead of official announcements.

Rather than treating such episodes solely as anomalies or evidence of information leakage, the paper examines whether they may reflect a broader behavioral pattern that appears across different contexts. The findings suggest that pre-announcement activity deserves greater attention within financial research because it challenges announcement-centered assumptions about timing and market response. By emphasizing the role of expectation formation and behavioral dynamics under uncertainty, the study contributes to ongoing discussions regarding market efficiency, price formation, and the processes through which markets interpret emerging developments.

RESEARCH TOPICS

Keywords

Pre-Announcement Behavioral Dislocation (PABD) Behavioral Economics Investor Sentiment Anticipatory Behavior Market Microstructure Price Discovery Information Asymmetry Insider Trading Market Efficiency Oil Futures Market Trading Volume Event Studies Financial Markets Uncertainty; Behavioral Finance

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
SOURCES & SCHOLARSHIP

References

  1. Alaali, H. M. H. (2025). The impact of liquidity on capital structure in UAE-based companies listed on the Dubai Financial Market. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-05-2025-0328
  2. Alaali, H. M. H. (2025a). DFAS-FEP: A Global Governance Standard for Responsible AI Use and Authorship Integrity in Financial Modelling. SSRN.https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5260517
  3. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.
  4. Fama, E. F. (1991). Efficient capital markets: II. Journal of Finance, 46(5), 1575–1617.
  5. Grossman, S. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. American Economic Review, 70(3), 393–408.
  6. Kyle, A. S. (1985). Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica, 53(6), 1315–1335.
  7. MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13–39.
  8. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
  9. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
  10. Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643–669. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884324
  11. Barberis, N., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 307–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00027-0
  12. Shiller, R. J. (2003). From efficient markets theory to behavioral finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003321164967
  13. Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118364
  14. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026. https://doi.org/10.1086/261849
  15. Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
  16. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan.
  17. Hasbrouck, J. (1991). Measuring the information content of stock trades. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03749.x
  18. O’Hara, M. (1995). Market microstructure theory. Blackwell Publishers.
  19. Meulbroek, L. K. (1992). An empirical analysis of illegal insider trading. The Journal of Finance, 47(5), 1661–1699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04679.x
  20. Easley, D., & O’Hara, M. (1992). Time and the process of security price adjustment. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 577–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04402.x
  21. International Organization of Securities Commissions. (2021). Market surveillance guidance on trading activity monitoring. IOSCO.
  22. Aggarwal, R. K., & Wu, G. (2006). Stock market manipulations. The Journal of Business, 79(4), 1915–1954. https://doi.org/10.1086/503652
  23. Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2009). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton University Press.
  24. Cumming, D., Johan, S., & Li, D. (2011). Exchange trading rules and stock market liquidity. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(3), 651–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.001
  25. De Bondt, W. F. M., & Thaler, R. H. (1985). Does the stock market overreact? The Journal of Finance, 40(3), 793–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05004.x
  26. Harasheh, M., et al. (2025). Investor sentiment spillovers in European financial markets: Insights from the COVID-19 and Russia–Ukraine conflict. ECB Working Paper Series No. 3050.
  27. Hashamia, R., & Maldonado, F. (2025). Can news predict the direction of oil price volatility? A language model approach with SHAP explanations.
  28. Huynh, N. (2025). Evolution of investor sentiment: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Review of Economics and Finance, 100.
  29. Lis, S. (2024). Investor sentiment in asset pricing models: A review of empirical evidence.
  30. Luo, X., et al. (2025). From bias to behavior: Learning bull-bear market dynamics with contrastive modeling.
  31. Mino, D., & Williamson, C. (2025). Sentiment and volatility in financial markets: A review of BERT and GARCH applications during geopolitical crises.
  32. Moodley, F. (2025). The effects of investor sentiment on stock return indices under bull and bear market conditions. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(2).
  33. Odean, T. (1998). Volume, volatility, price, and profit when all traders are above average. The Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1887–1934. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00078
  34. Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 11–46.
  35. Akçay, S. (2022). Investor sentiment and oil prices in the United States: Evidence from a time-varying causality test. Energy Research Letters, 3(2), 32633. https://doi.org/10.46557/001c.32633
  36. Nakhli, M. S., Hammami, H., & Shahbaz, M. (2025). Time-varying causality between investor sentiment and oil price: Does uncertainty matter? International Journal of Finance & Economics, 30(1), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2922
  37. Beckmann, J., Agyapong, J., & Williamson, C. (2026). Media sentiment and oil price expectations. Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.1177/01956574251368284
  38. Mohamad, A., Al-Yahyaee, K. H., Mensi, W., & Kang, S. H. (2025). Price discovery and time-varying causality dynamics in energy and financial markets. Computational Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-025-11164-z
  39. European Central Bank. (2024). Geopolitical risk and oil prices. European Central Bank.
  40. International Energy Agency. (2026). Oil market report: May 2026. International Energy Agency.
  41. Le, T. H., Pham, H. V., & Nguyen, D. K. (2022). Dynamic spillovers between oil price shocks, stock market returns and investor sentiment. Resources Policy, 79, 103017.
  42. Obi, P., Arene, C. J., & Nwafor, M. C. (2023). An event study on the reaction of equity and commodity markets to major geopolitical events. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(5), 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16050256
  43. Aizenman, J., Qian, X., & Jinjarak, Y. (2023). Geopolitical shocks and commodity market dynamics. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 31950. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31950
  44. Basdekis, C. V., Christopoulos, A. G., & Katsampoxakis, I. (2026). Geopolitical shocks and crude oil market tail risk. Economies, 14(3), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14030092.