Professional Makeup Organizational Model (Pmom): An Interdisciplinary Framework for Standardizing Backstage Operations in Fashion Productions

The contemporary fashion industry increasingly relies on multidisciplinary backstage teams operating under strict production schedules, high creative expectations, and rapidly changing visual requirements. Professional makeup has therefore evolved beyond an artistic procedure into a structured operational process requiring standardized planning, coordinated communication, technical consistency, and quality assurance [1–3].

 Despite the central role of makeup departments in fashion productions, limited scholarly attention has been devoted to organizational models capable of integrating management principles with standardized professional makeup methodologies.

This study presents the Professional Makeup Organizational Model (PMOM), an interdisciplinary organizational framework developed from professional observational practice in international fashion productions, educational activities, and large-scale beauty project coordination [4,5].

 The model standardizes the organizational structure of professional makeup teams through sequential stages including project planning, team organization, model assessment, workflow management, quality assurance, interdisciplinary communication, and post-production evaluation.

A distinctive component of the proposed framework is the integration of the AK Photoshop Face Method™ as the standardized technical protocol for makeup execution within PMOM. Rather than functioning solely as a corrective makeup methodology, the AK Photoshop Face Method™ provides a unified professional approach to facial assessment, skin preparation, texture refinement, individualized corrective techniques, and cosmetic balance. Integrating this methodology into organizational workflow reduces technical variability among team members while preserving individualized artistic adaptation according to facial anatomy, skin characteristics, and designer-directed visual concepts [20,21,25].

The proposed organizational model was developed through professional observations obtained during fashion productions involving multidisciplinary creative teams, international runway events, educational projects, and large-scale backstage coordination. Practical implementation demonstrated improvements in workflow efficiency, communication between creative departments, operational consistency, time management, and quality control while maintaining flexibility for individualized cosmetic decision-making [5,6].

The findings suggest that professional makeup should be recognized not only as an artistic discipline but also as a structured organizational system requiring standardized operational management supported by evidence-informed technical methodologies. The Professional Makeup Organizational Model (PMOM) may contribute to the development of standardized organizational practices in fashion productions, beauty education, commercial photography, television, and other multidisciplinary environments requiring coordinated professional makeup services.

Professional Makeup Organizational Model, PMOM, Fashion Production Management, Backstage Operations, Beauty Team Coordination, Workflow Standardization, AK Photoshop Face Method™, Quality Assurance, Beauty Education, Cosmetic Management.

Project Management Institute, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) and The Standard for Project Management, 7th ed. Newtown Square, PA, USA: Project Management Institute, 2021.

International Organization for Standardization, ISO 9001:2015/Amd 1:2024: Quality Management Systems—Requirements—Amendment 1: Climate Action Changes. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2024.

G. Baldessarelli, I. Stigliani, and K. D. Elsbach, “The aesthetic dimension of organizing: A review and research agenda,” Academy of Management Annals, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 363–405, 2022, doi: 10.5465/annals.2020.0198.

C. Ferraz et al., “Management systems for cultural and creative organizations: Research trajectories and a design agenda,” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2025.

M. Karppi et al., “Emergence of shared leadership in project teams: The role of triggering and hindering events,” Project Leadership and Society, 2024.

E. Jääskä et al., “Bridging change and project management: A review and future research agenda,” Project Leadership and Society, 2025.

M. Loderer et al., “How organisational and team climates foster design-thinking implementation and project success,” International Journal of Project Management, 2025.

C. A. Romein et al., “From research proposal to project management: A guide for planning collaborative and interdisciplinary workflows,” International Journal of Digital Humanities, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s42803-025-00107-7.

B. Bigliardi, E. Bottani, S. Filippelli, L. Tagliente, and K. Venturini, “Is any open innovation pattern emerging in the Italian fashion field? Preliminary evidence from case studies,” European Journal of Innovation Management, 2022,

S. Rainton et al., “Building collaborative innovation capacity in the fashion and textile sector: Reflections from the Future Fashion Factory programme,” Journal of Responsible Technology, 2025.

S. Y. Jang et al., “A comparative study of fashion-design processes using conventional and shape-memory textiles,” Fashion and Textiles, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40691-025-00421-2.

T. G. B. Teixeira et al., “Redesign in the textile industry: Proposal of a methodology based on design thinking and circular-economy practices,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 389, 2023, Art. no. 136588, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136588.

V. D. Dragomir and M. Dumitru, “Practical solutions for circular business models in the fashion industry,” Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 2022.

G. Gornostaeva, R. R. Rieple, and C. Barnes, “The development of digital commerce in the fashion industry: The role of dynamic capabilities and value-chain transformation,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023.

W. Choi et al., “Developing an AI-based automated fashion-design system: A case-based approach to the garment-development process,” Fashion and Textiles, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40691-023-00360-w.

Y. K. Lee and J. H. Lee, “How complex systems become involved in fashion-design creation: Development of a human–AI collaborative design model,” International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 2022.

J. P. Manaia, A. T. P. Pires, and A. M. B. Queiroz, “A comprehensive review of 3D and 4D printing technologies applied to textiles and fashion,” Fashion and Textiles, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40691-023-00339-7.

D. Casciani et al., “Digital body-measurement technologies in fashion design and production: Accuracy, workflow, and interdisciplinary competencies,” Discover Sustainability, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s43621-025-01269-8.

S. Skjulstad and A. Hvidsten, “Backstage matters: Designers’ invisible media work in independent fashion practice,” Fashion Theory, 2025, doi: 10.1080/1362704X.2024.2442183.

R. Sagastume-Canova et al., “Emerging trends in facial cosmetics: Innovation, science, technology, and personalized care,” Cosmetics, vol. 13, no. 2, Art. no. 58, 2026, doi: 10.3390/cosmetics13020058.

D. Vieira et al., “Regulation and safety of cosmetics: Pre- and post-market perspectives and current challenges,” Cosmetics, vol. 11, no. 6, Art. no. 184, 2024, doi: 10.3390/cosmetics11060184.

N. Matwiejczuk, A. Galicka, and M. M. Brzóska, “Review of the safety of application of cosmetic products containing parabens,” Journal of Applied Toxicology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 176–210, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jat.3917.

M. A. Bryszewska and J. Kulesza, “An analysis of the production process of a care-cosmetic line using problem-based learning tools,” Education Sciences, vol. 12, no. 11, Art. no. 816, 2022, doi: 10.3390/educsci12110816.

A. Endalamaw et al., “Continuous quality improvement and its effects on coordination, collaboration, training, and service performance: A scoping review,” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 24, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10828-0.

A. Erat et al., “Advancements in cosmetic science: Scientifically validated approaches to contemporary personal care,” Cosmetics, vol. 12, no. 5, Art. no. 202, 2025.

A. Klymko, AK Photoshop Face Method™: Author’s System of Professional Facial Assessment and Individual Makeup Planning. Brooklyn, NY, USA, 2026.