★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
Engineering and Technology OPEN ACCESS

A Cloud-Native Observability Framework for Kubernetes-Based Enterprise Private Cloud Platforms

Jeyakumar Ramachandran
Independent Researcher, USA
tajet 2024
VOL. 6 / NO. 10 OCTOBER
VOLUME 6
ISSUE 10
YEAR 2024
PAGES 169-174

Abstract

The rapid adoption of Kubernetes-based private cloud platforms has significantly increased the operational complexity of enterprise infrastructure. Traditional monitoring solutions provide isolated infrastructure metrics but lack comprehensive visibility across distributed cloud-native applications. This paper presents a cloud-native observability framework that unifies metrics, logs, distributed tracing, and event correlation to improve operational visibility across enterprise Kubernetes environments. The proposed architecture integrates OpenTelemetry for telemetry collection, Prometheus for metrics, Grafana for visualization, and centralized logging to provide end-to-end service observability. The framework is designed to enable proactive fault detection, faster incident diagnosis, and improved operational reliability while supporting the reduction of mean time to detect (MTTD) and mean time to recover (MTTR). Conceptual analysis indicates that the proposed framework can improve infrastructure visibility, simplify troubleshooting, and support enhanced platform reliability for enterprise private cloud deployments. Empirical validation remains necessary to establish its effectiveness in production environments.

Keywords

Cloud-Native Observability Kubernetes OpenTelemetry

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bellamkonda, S. (2016). Network Switches Demystified: Boosting Performance and Scalability. NeuroQuantology, 14(1), 193-196.
  2. Chen, X., & Wu, L. (2021). Low-latency switching architectures in modern SANs. Cluster Computing, 24(3), 1645–1659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-020-03071-6
  3. Ghosh, S., & Shah, M. (2019). Interoperability challenges in heterogeneous SAN environments. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 66, 103348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2019.103348
  4. Iqbal, M., & Raza, H. (2022). FC-NVMe architecture design and deployment considerations. International Journal of Network Management, 32(1), e2157. https://doi.org/10.1002/nem.2157
  5. Jena, J. (2017). Securing the Cloud Transformations: Key Cybersecurity Considerations for on-Prem to Cloud Migration. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 6(10), 20563-20568. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRSET.2017.0610229
  6. Liu, Y., Zhang, H., & Qian, F. (2022). Adaptive zoning and automated provisioning in Fibre Channel fabrics. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 19(3), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2022.3182349
  7. Petrov, D., & Kumar, S. (2020). Monitoring and visualization techniques for SAN performance management. Procedia Computer Science, 170, 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.252
  8. Singh, R., & Verma, A. (2020). Comparative analysis of high-speed SAN protocols: FC vs iSCSI. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 168, 102760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102760
  9. Tang, Y., & Rivera, C. (2021). Secure zoning mechanisms in Fibre Channel networks. IEEE Access, 9, 55812–55821. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070718
  10. Vangavolu, S. V. (2021). Continuous Integration and Deployment Strategies for MEAN Stack Applications. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 9(10), 53-57. https://ijritcc.org/index.php/ijritcc/article/view/11527/8841
  11. Wang, L., & Gupta, M. (2021). NVMe-oF and performance optimization in cloud storage networks. Future Generation Computer Systems, 118, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.11.009
  12. Zhao, Q., & Jin, Y. (2020). Fibre Channel switching efficiency and protocol evolution. Computer Networks, 178, 107307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107307