About Uzbek Editions Of Dīwān Lughāt Al-Turk

The article deals with the Uzbek editions of Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk. This work is important for the history and culture of the Turkic peoples. The works published over the years have been compared and analyzed. Many scholars have been involved in the translation and analysis of this work. However, there are differences between the editions of the work. Our main goal is to cite the history of the publication of the work and the views of the scholars who carried it out. In conclusion, the differences between the book editions of the work did not affect the content.


INTRODUCTION
The discovery of a manuscript of Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk, a huge encyclopedic monument of the 11th century, is of great importance for the literature, language, culture, history and ethnography of the eastern peoples, including the Turkic peoples. This led to scientific research. This work is important in revealing the history of the Turkic peoples. In addition, this work provides great information about the language and culture of the Turkic peoples living at that time. Especially in terms of the origin of the Turkish language and the The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations (ISSN -2689-100x) Published: January 17, 2021 | Pages: 92-99 Doi: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume03Issue01-18 IMPACT FACTOR 2020: 5. 525 OCLC -1121105668 etymology of the words, there is no equivalent to this work. The study of this work in Uzbekistan began in the mid-20th century.
While it was originally translated, much scientific work has been done since then to analyze its content. The work has been translated into many languages and copies have been reproduced.

MAIN FINDINGS AND RESULTS
The work was written by Mahmud Kashgari Diwan was first published by Rifat of Kilis, and the Arabic commentary of the dictionary was not translated into Turkish [5]. After that, Basim Atalay carried out the second translation and publication in 1939-1941 [1]. Basim Atalay is a relatively excellent publication in Turkish, and the first edition in Uzbek is based on it.
The first European translation and study of Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk was initiated by Karl Brockelmann, a well-known orientalist and author of many works on ancient writings [6].
The researcher does not translate the dictionary in full, but provides a transcription of Turkish words and a German translation. This edition consists of a Turkish-German dictionary of words in Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk [11].
Abdurahf Fitrat is the first researcher and publisher of Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk in Uzbek [3]. In 1927, on the basis of the devon, the scholar published a collection of "The oldest examples of Turkish literature." The author, who was the first Uzbek scholar to approach this work, quoted fragments from the devon in the complex. The Kashgar people translated the samples of oral works, prose and poetic quatrains into Uzbek and connected them according to their content, rhyme and weight, and concluded that these literary fragments are parts of complete epics. "Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk"нинг ўзбек тилидаги илк тадқиқотчиси ва ношири Абдурауф Фитратдир. The edition of Fitrat consists of three parts, the introductory part of which is the author's article "One or two words". He then attached the quartets, written in short weight, under conditional headings in the first part. The Alp Er Tonga mourning is also in this section. In the second part, he systematized the bytes written in educational-moral and mainly masnavi.
Fitrat notes that in some examples there are many dictionaries that need explanation, and by interpreting them in their place, the third part is gained so as not to distract the reader from the goal [4]. It also interprets 125 words according to a dictionary. He studies the linguistic features of such sources as Qutadg'u bilig, Hibat ul-haqayiq, Muqaddimat ul-adab, and makes comparisons where necessary. In his other works, Fitrat was one of the first to mention that the history of the Uzbek language goes directly to Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk.
Based on this research complex, which has not lost its relevance to this day, it was later published and translated by Turkish and Western scholars. The collection was republished in 2008 under the supervision of O.
Khamroeva [4]. The publication began with the foreword by the editor H. Boltaboev "Ancient Turkic sources in the interpretation of Fitrat." After the author's text, the author's article "Study of Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk " up to Fitrat was given at the end of the preface and a photocopy "The oldest samples of Turkish literature" was attached.
Finally, in 1960-1963, the Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk was first translated into Uzbek and published [8]. The services of Doctor of Philology Salihkori Mutallibov, who performed this difficult task, are highly appreciated. According to the author, the translation is based on a copy of the devon printed in Istanbul in hijri 1333 [5]. The translation was the second perfect publication in Turkology after Basim Atalay, which was the impetus for further research.
S. Mutallibov spoke on the diwan in June 1957 at the scientific conference of orientalists of the Soviet Union. His work "A Brief Essay on the History of Morphology and Vocabulary" (Tashkent, 1959) compares the written monuments of the XI century, mainly "Qutadg'u bilig" and "Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk" with examples from the works of Alisher Navoi.
The first edition in Uzbek consists of three volumes and was published by the Academy of Sciences in 3,000 copies. The first volume was published in 1960, the second in 1961, and the third in 1963.
In the translation, 7217 words (3293 in volume 1, 1497 in volume 2, 2427 in volume 3) are highlighted as the main article, and some of them have 887 comments by the translator [12].
The first volume of the publication consists of 499 pages. Initially, the translator and publisher included the article "The great philologists of the XI century and their unique works" (pages 7-40). It deals with Yusuf Khos Hajib and his didactic work "Kutadgu bilig", the great 11th century linguist Mahmud Kashgari, the 11th century valuable written monument "Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk» and "Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk" to the Uzbek language. In addition, issues such as Diwan translation and transcription has been analyzed and interpreted. A cliché copy of the geographical map drawn by Kashgari  The word "nouns" in the translation of S. Mutallibov has been changed to "names".
The first volume consists of 346 pages. The text is printed in Cyrillic alphabet. On the cover is a picture of Mahmud Kashgari in Urumqi, a picture of a statue in Istanbul, and on the inside of the cover is a geographical map of the  The perfect edition of "Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk", based on the translation of S. Mutallibov, was revised, supplemented and amended in 2017 [7]. The publication is the result of many years of fruitful research by the world-renowned scholar of Turkish philology, Doctor of Philology, Professor Kasimjon Sodiqov. R.Alimuhammedov noted: "I have personally witnessed that teacher Kasimjon Sodiqov has been working hard on this book for eleven years. An expert who has seen this edition will immediately notice that this work is radically different from other editions" [2].
The publication consists of 482 pages, printed as a single book in the Cyrillic alphabet. The introductory part of the work includes an article by K. Sodiqov on Mahmud Kashgari and his work Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk (pp. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. This section provides information on Devon's manuscript, linguistic terms used by Kashgari, and comments on the morphology and phonetics of words. Also included are comments on the principles of Devon's preparation for publication (pp. [10][11] and the transcription used in the text (p. 12).
This is followed by a transliteration and translation of the manuscript (THE BOOK OF THE TURKISH WORDS. Author: Mahmud bin al-Husayn bin Muhammad al-Kashgari (may God have mercy on him) the title is written (p. 13).
We do not agree with anyone who says that the book is in Turkmen... ". K. Sodikov writes that Abubakr Damashki, the secretary who copied the diwan, wrote the foreword. According to him, the book is not in Turkmen and his father is from Turkey. Writes that he asked about the book. They also came to this land at a young age and do not understand the content of the book because they do not know their language well.

CONCLUSION
It is a great achievement that the work has been published as a book. But it is not without some minor flaws. for example. According to S. Rustami, one of the researchers of the devon, this preface was written by one of the owners of the book [11]. S.Mutallibov and H.Boltaboev's publications do not include this preface, and there is no information.
Then comes the Devon Introduction (pages 14-27), the main Dictionary section (pages 28-428). Also included is a page of the preface of the manuscript with the Uyghur alphabet, a map of the Earth drawn by Kashgari, and another page (between pages 192-195). At the