https://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc/issue/feedThe American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology2025-06-18T05:38:21+00:00The USA Journalseditor@theamericanjournals.comOpen Journal Systems<p>E-ISSN <strong>2693-0803</strong></p> <p>DOI Prefix <strong>10.37547/tajpslc</strong></p> <p>Started Year <strong>2019</strong></p> <p>Frequency <strong>Monthly</strong></p> <p>Language <strong>English</strong></p> <p>APC <strong>$250</strong></p>https://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc/article/view/6222Gender Dynamics in the Courtroom: The Influence of Prosecutor's Sex on Perceptions of Defendant Culpability2025-06-01T13:25:57+00:00Dr. Hannah McAllisterhannah@theamericanjournals.comDr. Zoe Nguyennguyen@theamericanjournals.com<p>The role of the prosecutor in the criminal justice system is imbued with significant power and discretion, influencing charging decisions, plea bargains, and ultimately, the perception of defendant culpability. While extensive research has explored factors affecting juror and public perceptions of guilt, the impact of the prosecutor's gender remains an underexplored area. This article investigates how the gender of a prosecutor might influence perceptions of a defendant's culpability, drawing upon theories of gender stereotypes and role congruity. Through a comprehensive literature review, we examine the powerful role of prosecutors, the mechanisms of culpability perception, and the broader effects of gender in professional and legal contexts. This review outlines a hypothetical experimental design to empirically test this relationship, discussing potential findings and their implications for fairness, bias, and professional development within the legal system. Understanding these gender dynamics is crucial for fostering a more equitable and just legal process.</p>2025-06-01T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Hannah McAllister, Dr. Zoe Nguyenhttps://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc/article/view/6283Implementation Of Dual-Use Technologies in Defense and Public Security2025-06-18T05:38:21+00:00Kristijan Ilovačakristijan@theamericanjournals.com<p>This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms for introducing dual-use technologies into defense and public-security frameworks. The topic’s relevance stems from rapid advances in technical solutions that blur the traditional lines between civilian and military applications—creating new opportunities to boost efficiency across multiple sectors, while simultaneously posing significant risks of international destabilization and threats to national integrity. The study aims to survey contemporary models for integrating dual-use technologies, to identify regulatory, economic, and ethical constraints, and to pinpoint the most promising practices for strengthening defense capabilities and enhancing public protection in a holistic manner. Emphasis is placed on technological domains such as artificial intelligence, biological systems, cybersecurity, and autonomous unmanned platforms. Drawing on current research, the paper demonstrates how adaptive management strategies for dual-use technologies can deliver flexible responses to rapidly evolving challenges. Special attention is given to the need for robust interagency and transnational coalitions, as well as the creation of legal frameworks that simultaneously foster innovation. The findings will benefit defense-policy and security-management professionals, technology-transfer experts, and representatives of governmental bodies and high-tech firms seeking balanced solutions in an era of technological turbulence.</p>2025-06-18T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Kristijan Ilovačahttps://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc/article/view/6280Judicial Provision Of The Right To Reinstatement: Legal Basis And Practical Problems2025-06-17T20:54:58+00:00Mavluda Boboraimovamavluda@theamericanjournals.com<p>This article analyzes the legal basis and practical significance of the right to appeal to the court in disputes regarding reinstatement. The right to judicial protection is one of the constitutional and inalienable human rights, and this right also serves as an important guarantee in labor relations. The Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the Labor Code, the Law "On Courts," and international legal documents, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, widely cover the right to appeal to the court. In particular, the new edition of the Labor Code clearly defines the procedure for considering claims for reinstatement in court. At the same time, it was indicated that there are some problems, ambiguities, and norms in the legislation leading to various interpretations in the restoration of labor rights of rehabilitated persons. The article takes a systematic approach to these issues.</p>2025-06-17T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Mavluda Boboraimovahttps://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc/article/view/6262Concept and classification of public services2025-06-10T13:47:47+00:00Rakhmanov Zafarjon Zayniddinovichrakhmanov@theamericanjournals.com<p>This article analyzes the concept and classification of public service. The opinions of scientists and specialists on civil service were discussed. The experience of national and foreign countries in the provision of public services is analyzed.</p> <p>Proposals and recommendations for solving problems related to the industry are given.</p>2025-06-09T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Rakhmanov Zafarjon Zayniddinovichhttps://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc/article/view/6238Interaction of State and Public Structures in The Field of Legal Aid2025-06-04T12:47:46+00:00Burlachenko Petro Dmytrovychdmytrovych@theamericanjournals.com<p>The article presents an analysis of the interaction between state and public structures in the field of legal assistance to ensure access to justice for socially vulnerable groups. In this article, the mechanisms of cooperation, barriers, and strategies to enhance effectiveness under conditions of intensified social stratification and legal complexity will be examined. The relevance of this work can be attributed to the enormous scale of the problem: 5 billion people lack access to justice, and 92% of low-income Americans face unresolved legal issues. The methodological framework employed here comprises a comparative analysis of three legal systems (India, the USA, and Australia), conducted through a systematic review of 13 sources (international acts, statistics, and cases), supplemented by content data evaluation. It was observed that state aid governed by statutes provides fundamental support. However, it comes with bureaucracy and underfunding. Key findings underscore the need for reforms that can fundamentally eliminate systemic barriers. Major issues include gender differences, significant delays in immigration courts, and insufficient free assistance. The successful plans that halted large evictions by teaming up in the Right to Counsel program in New York City reveal something else. Suggestions include more cash, online help, law school, and focused things for weak people (like migrants and ethnic groups). This article is useful for attorneys, human rights advocates, lawmakers, and scholars who want to promote justice, access, and social fairness.</p>2025-06-04T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Burlachenko Petro Dmytrovychhttps://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc/article/view/6281Predictive Justice and Artificial Intelligence: Comparative Legal Analysis of Judicial Practice2025-06-17T20:57:50+00:00Hurshid Sadikovhurshid@theamericanjournals.com<p>The article is dedicated to research on the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the justice sector, with a focus on predictive coding and "predicted justice." A comparative legal analysis of the practice of the USA, China, European Union countries, and France was conducted. Special attention is paid to the role of AI at the proof stage: analysis of evidence, automation of legal procedures, and reduction of corruption risks. Examples of court cases illustrate both the possibilities and risks of applying AI in court proceedings. Institutional and ethical limitations, including issues of trust, algorithm reliability, and equality of parties, are also considered. It is noted that despite technological progress, full confidence in AI in the judicial system has not yet been formed. It was concluded that it is necessary to develop general regulations and gradually implement AI, taking into account the principles of procedural fairness.</p>2025-06-17T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Hurshid Sadikovhttps://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc/article/view/6263Some aspects of organizing prosecutor's supervision over the implementation of legislation in the forestry sphere2025-06-11T11:15:19+00:00Mamadaliev Bakhtiyor Zakirovichmamadaliev@theamericanjournals.com<p>This scientific article analyzes the key theoretical, legal, and practical aspects of organizing prosecutorial oversight for the precise and rigorous implementation of legislation in the forestry sector of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Special attention is given to identifying the characteristic features and problematic situations that arise during the execution of supervisory activities in this field. Moreover, the work substantiates relevant proposals and recommendations aimed at further optimizing and institutionally improving the mechanisms of prosecutorial oversight, taking into account the specifics of legal regulation, environmental factors, and strategic objectives of sustainable forest resource management within the context of national legislation and international commitments.</p>2025-06-10T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Mamadaliev Bakhtiyor Zakirovichhttps://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc/article/view/6251Evolution and modern trends in the development of the foreign policy of the Republic of Korea2025-06-08T15:15:48+00:00Zebiniso Zaripova Abdurahmanovnazebiniso@theamericanjournals.com<p>The study analyzes the development of the Republic of Korea's foreign policy. The country has followed a path of strict dependence on the United States in both security and economics, while simultaneously working to strengthen its position as a "middle" and "global" power, influencing politics in the East Asian region and the world as a whole. The evolution of its foreign policy presents an interesting case study regarding the tools and mechanisms used to formulate strategies to achieve its interests. Although the Republic of Korea is limited in choosing a strategic course, it has managed to develop soft power mechanisms in the context of globalization, establishing itself as an important player in innovation and economics both regionally and globally.</p>2025-06-08T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Zebiniso Zaripova Abdurahmanovna