Improving The Effectiveness Of Administrative Sanctions For Violations Of The Established Procedure In The Conduct Of Public Events

The article addresses the issues of improving the Code of Administrative Republik of Uzbekistan for violations of the established rules related to the organization and conduct of public events.


INTRODUCTION
Chapter 15 of the Code of Administrative Responsibility of the Republic of Uzbekistan establishes administrative liability for offenses that violate public order. Such administrative offenses are defined as an violation of state and public order, an unlawful act or omission, and for which liability is provided. The commission of such an offense shall be the sole basis for the imposition of administrative sanctions. The form of guilt is expressed differently in the legal norms establishing liability for violation of public order. In some cases, for example, the biased or extreme nature of the action is directly indicated, while in others the exact form stems from the content of the biased action structure.
Due to the issues raised by the courts on the application of the law on liability for riots and the adoption of new criminal laws, the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan adopted a number of decisions [1]. Every year, about 20,000 public, political, cultural, national, professional and sports events are held in the country. In total, more than 55 million participants are taking part in these events. One of the administrative and legal problems in ensuring public order and safety by law enforcement agencies and the National Guard during public events is the lack of an administrative code in the current Code of Administrative Responsibility for violating the rules of public order and public safety The administrative legal norm of this article is mainly the rules of holding public events in relation to the organizers of public events, ie the rules "On measures to further improve the organization and conduct of public events" approved by the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated July 29, 2014 No. 205 applied without fulfilling the requirements. Violations of public order and security are common in the practice of law enforcement agencies, mainly during public events.
These offenses are more socially dangerous than petty hooliganism (Article 183). Because an offense committed during a public event can lead to mass riots or injure many citizens.
In practice, offenses of this nature are now classified by law enforcement agencies as petty hooliganism offenses.
According to the legal scholar H.R.Alimov, public order is a system of social relations regulated by moral, legal norms and the rules of morality, etiquette, customs [3]. Public order is protected by state bodies, public associations and citizens. The main role in this work is played by law enforcement agencies.
Minor hooliganism (Article 183), ie insulting with obscene words in public places, insulting citizens, and other similar acts that violate public order and public order-intentional disregard for the rules of conduct in society, lead to administrative liability. Public order is the object of petty hooliganism. Public order is a relationship based on the observance of the rule of law in public places. Public order is strengthened not only by legal norms, but also by other social norms, ethics, customs, norms of public organizations [4]. Legal norms play a key role, as they determine the legal liability, type and norm of punishment for a breach of order. The behavior of the perpetrator is a clear disregard for the interests of society, the surrounding citizens, low cultural level, disregard for existing rules of morality and decency.
Behavior that disturbs the peace of citizens and public order characterizes the objective aspect of the offense. These include: swearing in public, insulting citizens, that is, abusive behavior that insults the honor, dignity, and peace of another person. It also includes forcing a citizen into a conversation that insults his human dignity, shaking his hand with a whip or grabbing his hand by force, tearing off his hat; cigarette smoke can be blown into his face and so on. An important sign of the objective side of petty harassment is the situation, space, time. In different contexts, the same behavior has different meanings. For example, swearing in public with obscene language can be described as a petty hooliganism, as well as a criminal act of hooliganism at a meeting, celebration or other public event (Article 277 § 3 of the CC).
According to the legal scholar H. Alimov, petty hooliganism is often carried out in public places, that is, it is based on public perception [5]. However, given that disregard for the community or human dignity becomes apparent, the offense may have been committed in secret.
Minor harassment is characterized by the fact that it is subjectively intentional and often overt. The perpetrator realizes that he is acting against the law, and as a result, allows the consequences -a violation of public order and public order. Hooliganism is an act of deliberate disrespect for the rules of public order. Based on this legal definition, it should be noted that the behavior of hooliganism is an violation of public order. Public order as an object of aggression means the necessary behavior in the interaction of people, the peace of society and citizens, universally recognized moral, legal, religious, spiritual, national and other traditions and customs, which form the basis of social behavior and rules of conduct. and the set of social relationships that ensure respect and adherence to values must be understood. Hooliganism is manifested in active actions that objectively represent disregard for the rules of morality in society.
Forms of disregard for the rules of morality in society are diverse, as public order can also be disrupted by obscene language, beatings, violence against citizens, destruction or damage to property [6]. But for all acts of hooliganism, it is inherently a violation of the public order, which is legally protected, by disregarding the rules of morality that are accepted by all in society. Ignorance of the rules of morality in society means disrespect for the law, social behavior and morals, generally accepted traditions and customs, the established way of life. A person commits certain actions that constitute public order and harm social relations protected by law or pose Hooliganism often takes place in public places (theater, park, stadium, street, restaurant, cafe, etc.) where people work and have fun, but hooliganism-type riots and wars often take place in non-public places. In deciding whether such incidents should be considered hooliganism, it is necessary to determine whether there are clear signs of disregard for the rules of public order and the well-being of not only family members but also other citizens. Under current law, there must be a causal link between the offender's actions and the violation of public order. An act without a causal link must be considered a crime against a person or property. The introduction of this article in the administrative legislation will legally systematize the actions of law enforcement agencies and the National Guard to ensure public order and safety during public events, and will prevent criminal prosecution of offenders for these actions.
Taking into account the problematic situations in the above administrative legislation and the practical activities of law enforcement agencies, it is expedient to state Article 202 of the Code of Administrative Responsibility of the Republic of Uzbekistan in the following wording:

Article 202. Creating conditions for unauthorized public events
Provision of premises or other property (vehicles and communications, printing and other technical equipment) to the organizers and participants of unauthorized public events or other conditions for such events -from fifty to one hundred times the basic calculation for citizens, and for officials -seventy shall be punishable by a fine of one hundred and fifty times the amount of the fine.